Ranking Linux Distributions for 2025: a tier list for my use case !

{ts:234} down a notch this year the reason is there's just not enough testing on this drro and not enough people working on it {ts:242} to really be a stable and reliable solution cracks were starting to appear last year but this year they flat out {ts:250} broke some upgrades and some systems by moving to a new LTS base and before that they had big issues with the move to … {ts:302} it unsuitable in my eyes but they do have updated packages in their repos to move beyond what Debian stable offers {ts:310} fortunately now MX Linux just doesn't give me anything that I really want here it's not necessarily a faster dis throw {ts:318} it's not necessarily more lightweight apart from maybe dis space usage which I really don't care about because I never … {ts:368} still in hell no for me this year as a Dro it is just completely outdated with very old package versions that they {ts:377} don't update often enough and they're missing plenty of things in these repost they tried to fix that with their own {ts:385} packaging format called Ling long but it doesn't do anything use full or new it just seems to be a flatback fork if you … {ts:820} placed in no thanks last year because it just did not receive any updates to its desktop they did update the base of the {ts:829} drro some drivers and the kernel but as of now it's still based on 22.4 which is unacceptable for a Linux {ts:838} desktop going in 2025 the other issue is that the desktop environment it shapes is a very old gnome version without any … {ts:1003} to me the potential performance gain of compiling things from a hardware specifically is just not worth the wait {ts:1010} time or the learning curve I really like tinkering but this is way too much for me and honestly judging from benchmarks {ts:1017} you will gain like 2% performance after wasting hours the use flags are a cool thing you can build versions of the