www.youtube.com
Why Ubuntu Sucks in 2025
Excerpt
The community was {ts:36} buzzing. Developers were building amazing tools and everything felt fresh. It offered a simple, intuitive desktop {ts:40} experience that was easy for beginners to pick up yet powerful enough for advanced users. But as time went on, {ts:45} something shifted. The focus seemed to drift from user choice and simplicity to something else entirely. One of the {ts:50} biggest concerns for many long-term users is the adoption of Gnome as the default desktop environment. While Gnome {ts:54} has its fans, it's also often criticized for being resource intensive and less customizable than older desktop … It's like replacing a fast, {ts:72} functional race car with a luxury sedan that's comfortable but sluggish. But it's not just the desktop environment. {ts:76} Many users point to the increasing number of pre-installed applications and tools. What was once a minimal install {ts:81} that you could build upon is now for some a bloated mess. It feels as if Ubuntu is trying to be everything to {ts:86} everyone and in doing so it loses its identity. This leads to heavier system resource usage and a slower overall {ts:91} experience especially on older hardware. It's a classic case of trying to add too many features resulting in more problems {ts:96} than solutions. Options snaps in particular are a gamecher. They're secure and easy. {ts:101} The push for snap packages while offering containerized applications for security has also drawn criticism. These {ts:106} packages can be slower to launch and consume more disk space, adding to the overall bloat. It feels like a departure {ts:111} from the traditional Linux philosophy of small, efficient, and interconnected programs, and perhaps the most {ts:115} controversial change directly impacts user choice and control. Ubuntu's decisions sometimes feel like they are {ts:120} forcing users down a specific path rather than empowering them. This can create a sense of frustration, {ts:124} especially for those who value the freedom and flexibility that Linux is supposed to offer. It's like being {ts:128} offered a buffet, but then being told exactly what you must eat. So, where does this leave us in 2025? … {ts:151} system it once was. The shift in philosophy and the move towards a more controlled environment have pushed some {ts:156} users away. It's a tough pill to swallow for those who remember Ubuntu as the epitome of Linux freedom. The narrative {ts:160} has changed and what was once a beacon of choice now feels like a guided door. … The debate isn't just about personal preference, {ts:213} but about the direction of a major open- source project. Is Ubuntu still serving its original purpose or has it veered ... These questions lead many to seek out leaner, more responsive distributions. Some argue that this
Related Pain Points
Desktop environment degradation and poor UI/UX on Linux
5Major Linux desktop environments (Unity, GNOME 3, KDE 4/5) have either declined in quality or become overly heavyweight. UI antipatterns are common, and the overall desktop experience has worsened in recent years.
Snap Package Performance and Overhead
5Snap packages are slower to launch, consume more disk space, and create additional mount points, contributing to system bloat. They represent a departure from the Unix philosophy of small, efficient programs.
System Bloat from Pre-installed Applications
5Ubuntu ships with many pre-installed applications and tools that create system bloat. What was once a minimal install is now heavy, leading to slower overall performance and loss of Ubuntu's identity.
Reduced User Choice and Control
5Ubuntu's design decisions sometimes force users down specific paths rather than empowering them. The shift toward a more controlled environment limits freedom and flexibility that Linux traditionally offered.